Skip to content

Puerto Rico Bill Divisions Not Only Partisan

The U.S. House of Representatives Natural Resources Committee’s hearing today on legislation to address the fiscal problems of government in Puerto Rico demonstrated the extent of differences among Republicans as well as between Democrats and Republicans on the measure, H.R. 4900, introduced late yesterday by Representative Sean Duffy (R-WI).

Only four Republicans other than the principal author, Committee Chairman Rob Bishop (UT), seemed to be in favor of the bill. They were: Reps. Raul Labrador (ID), who was born in Puerto Rico; Garret Graves (LA); Bruce Westerman (AR); and Doug LaMalfa (CA).

By contrast, negative statements or questions came from: Reps. Doug Lamborn (CO); Rob Wittman (VA); Louie Gohmert (TX); John Fleming (LA); Tom McClintock (CA); Jeff Duncan (SC); Jody Hice (GA); and Delegate Amata Radewagen (AS), although hers were about the non-inclusion of provisions for Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC), Child Tax Credit, and Medicaid equality for the territories, and the objections of the others primarily concerned the forced debt adjustment provisions. Issues they raised included the rights of creditors, enabling bankruptcy for bonds bought when bankruptcy was not an option, the board that the bill would establish being able to reprioritize types of debt for payment purposes, the bill not including substantial measures to reverse Puerto Rico’s continuing economic decline, and bankruptcy for the territory’s ‘state’-level bonds, setting a precedent for bankruptcy for debts of States.

Counselor to the U.S. Secretary of the Treasury Antonio Weiss expressed serious concerns about the bill’s creditor collective action provisions delaying restructuring; its stay on legal action to force government in Puerto Rico to pay debts being limited to February 15, 2017 and possibly not lasting until restructuring; and the support of a supermajority of five of seven board members required to force debt restructuring. He also asserted that the bill needed to provide more assurance that pensions would be paid and objected to its $4.25 per hour for up to five years minimum wage for workers in Puerto Rico under age 25.

Weiss also estimated that a debt restructuring process under the bill could take two years and said that he would be meeting with Bishop and staff right after the hearing to work out the concerns with the bill that he noted.

Ranking Minority Member Raul Grijalva (AZ) and other Democrats generally echoed concerns raised by Weiss. Puerto Rico’s Resident Commissioner Pedro Pierluisi was clear that he could accept a board that would have the final decision on actions of government in Puerto Rico affecting finances if the bill’s restructuring language “would work.”

Non-Committee Member Nydia Velazquez (D-NY), however, said that board authority with respect to laws, regulations, and contracts went to an “insulting” extent, objected to there not being a witness from the Government of Puerto Rico at the hearing, and objected to the lack of economic provisions, such as the EITC.  “This is not a democracy,” she added.
Rep. Jared Polis (CO) advocated for statehood for Puerto Rico, tax incentives for manufacturing in the territory, and Medicaid funding.  He was explicit in noting that Puerto Rico’s territorial status is a problem.
Rep. William Clay (MO) expressed a desire for provisions to ensure pension payments.
Rep. Niki Tsongas (MA) noted her concern about a provision of the bill that would transfer 3,100 acres of the island of Vieques, Puerto Rico from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) to local control — which had been recommended to Congress by the FWS in 2000 with President Bill Clinton’s personal support but which the FWS now opposes.  Rep. Tsongas also recognized her large Puerto Rican constituency.

Rep. Norma Torres (CA) decried the bill’s wage provisions, and Del. Madeleine Bordallo (GU) cited the non-inclusion of Medicaid, EITC, and pension provisions as a serious problem with the bill.

The Committee’s markup of the bill originally scheduled for 10:00 tomorrow morning to consider amendments and take votes has been postponed. No new date has been set.

3 thoughts on “Puerto Rico Bill Divisions Not Only Partisan”

  1. Reducing the minimum wage is ridiculous!
    One of the PPD’S (“commonwealth ” party) weapons,against statehood is that wages are “one third” that of Mississippi, the “poorest” US state.
    Increased wage gap between the territory & states is welcomed by the neo socialist PPD.

  2. On Puerto Rico:

    An Oversight and Management Board ??…or
    A Self-Determination and Decolonization Board.

    The proposed legislation from the House Natural Resources Committee of the USA-Congress, ostensibly designed to rescue Puerto Rico from its debt crisis, imposes an “Oversight and Management Board” (Puerto Rico Oversight, Management, and Economic Stability Act’’ or PROMESA/Spanish for “promise”) that further worsens the colonial status of the ‘commonwealth’ of Puerto Rico.

    Puerto Rico does not self-govern and is actually a territory with a limited ability and authority to govern over its own interests, disputes, and affairs.
    The “Oversight Board” will be empowered to audit the Puerto Rican government and to create “efficiencies and reforms” to address the debt crisis. This means more austerity, which has already ravaged the island and worsened its economic prospects.
    The inevitable result would be a disaster for vulnerable Puerto Ricans, and it will create a bonanza for private corporations looking to take over public functions.
    It is time for Congress to act and start a collaborative process of Self-Determination conducive to the Decolonization of Puerto Rico. The more than half a millennium of subordination to the will of others is long enough.

    To ignore how colonialism has shaped the current crisis is a gross distortion of reality and damages efforts to devise any fundamental solutions.

    Washington never granted islanders control of their lives, welfare, and destiny.
    Puerto Rico have no say over foreign relations, commerce and trade, their airspace, land and offshore waters, immigration and emigration, nationality and citizenship, currency, maritime laws, military service, USA bases on its territory, constitutionality of its laws, jurisdictions and legal procedures, treaties, radio and television, communications, agriculture, its natural resources; not to mention the psychological damage done to the Puerto Rican psyche.

    By taking control of all of these endeavors, as a sovereign nation, Puerto Rico can build up a sustainable development program to meet immediate and future needs addressing social, economic, and environmental objectives.
    It is time for Puerto Rico to control its own destiny through a process of Self-Determination and Decolonization and become a Sovereign Nation.

    Puerto Rico and the U.S. Congress should engage in a collaborative process pursuant to the decolonization and eventual sovereignty of Puerto Rico . A “Self-Determination and Decolonization Board” could be established to meet these ends. Not wasting efforts in implementing an “Oversight and Management Board” that would spell disaster for vulnerable Puerto Ricans.
    The Puerto Rico Oversight, Management, and Economic Stability Act’’ (or PROMESA) is destined to be an unfulfilled PROMISE for the people of Puerto Rico.
    As indicated previously, the implementation of an ” Oversight and Management Board” would lead to disaster for vulnerable Puerto Ricans and will not resolve the “eternal” colonial problem of the island which is, after all, the root cause of Puerto Rico’s maladies.
    Timely action is as important as the declared commitment to Decolonizing Puerto Rico. Congress should discharge its constitutional responsibility and set in motion a process directed towards this end.

  3. Congress is still waiting for the Padilla administration to produce audited budget statements from 2015 & 2015.

    PREPA, a government sanctioned monopoly, continues to provide overpriced energy, according to the utility’s restructuring agency.

    As a state, Puerto Rico would have elected officials advocating for its interests in D.C. A right enjoyed by Luis Gutierrez and Nydia Velazquez.

    As an independent country, it could apply for help from the International Monetary Fund.

    The PDP continues to ask for state-like treatment for Medicaid and Medicare recipients. I agree that Island residents deserve this.

    A PERMANENT resolution to the status question would end years of crisis oriented planning and action.

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to our Magazine, and enjoy exclusive benefits

Subscribe to the online magazine and enjoy exclusive benefits and premiums.

[wpforms id=”133″]