Puerto Rican Action Movement Proposes Free Association; Gonzalez-Colon Pushes Back

An organization calling itself the Puerto Rican Action Movement (MAP, from El Movimiento de Acción Puertorriqueña) has proposed a compact of free association (COFA) with the United States. According to El Nuevo Dia, their proposal features three principles:

  • Full self-government for Puerto Rico, with a financial assistance agreement including funding from federal programs, grants, and a trust fund that would be “subject to planning, monitoring, and information requirements”.
  • US citizenship of those who were born on the island during its time as a territory. Those born under the new sovereign status would be Puerto Rican citizens, “without limiting the right they may have under US law to claim US citizenship.” There is no clear path for citizens of an independent nation to “claim US citizenship.”
  • Puerto Rico will have sovereignty over its foreign affairs, while the United States would retain responsibility in the areas of defense and security.

Their website contains a more detailed list of the principles they have in mind.

“We seek to define free association as we believe that it is the only viable and available status formula, but for it to be a real option it must be defined by a group of experts led from the White House,” said Efraín Vázquez Vera, professor of International Relations and Political Science at the University of Puerto Rico, on behalf of MAP. “We will not be able to exercise our right to self-determination without having in black and white the implications of free association.”

Julio Ortiz Luquis, professor of International Relations at the City University of New York and spokesperson for MAP in the States, called for President Biden to establish “a negotiating commission.” Such a commission would, says Ortiz Luquis, need to include representatives from the White House and members of Congress.

Free Association has been on the ballot in the past

While the most recent plebiscite, held in November 2020, was a straight yes/no vote on statehood which statehood won, Free Association has been on previous referendum ballots. It is a form of independence, according to the Department of Justice, and has been so identified in previous votes.

In fact, the DOJ rejected a draft of the 2017 ballot in order to make sure that Puerto Rican voters understood that “Free Association” is a form of independence. The Compact of Free Association between the United States and the nations that are now Freely Associated States are deals between sovereign nations, not between a territory and the United States.

This option has never done well in any of the status votes. In 2012, 61.16% chose statehood, 33.34% voted for sovereign free association, and 5.49% preferred independence.  Given the 28% difference between independence and sovereign free association – essentially two forms of sovereignty – it remains unclear what the 33.34% of voters who selected sovereign free association thought would be included in that package – perhaps continued federal benefits and US citizenship – and how viable those options would be.

Enhanced Commonwealth and Free Association

Resident Commissioner responds

Jenniffer Gonzalez-Colon (R-PR) responded in a written statement, “The pretensions of these tricksters, who do everything in secret from the People, are to bring independence through the kitchen, even though Puerto Rico has repeatedly voted in favor of statehood. They intend to impose independence and free association over the people, who have expressed their mandate for statehood beyond any politician or party on the island.”

She points out that MAP acknowledges that a COFA can be unilaterally ended by either party, pointing out that this means Puerto Rico could end up with full independence and no compact of free association.

“With total tranquility and cynicism they say that those who are born after the signing of the treaty, will not be American citizens, but they do not say that those of us who have it are in danger of losing it, because it may be a condition of the United States, who does not have to have a republic made up of American citizens,” added González. “What seems even more incredible to me is that they ask the United States to give us federal funds indefinitely. Ha! They want the benefits of statehood under independence. How little seriousness is in what they propose: that the federal programs continue. How little dignity!”

Gonzalez-Colon continued, “As an elected official to Congress representing the People of Puerto Rico, I assure those who have such claims that… we will have to ask every Puerto Rican who loves his citizenship and every statehood supporter, that we act in concert to show them what we mean. it is dignity, democracy. We statesmen are the majority.”

4 Comments

Israel Vazquez

The only solution to Puerto Rico status is statehood. I don’t know what that new party is thinking! But, what they present for Puerto Rico is not the solution! The investment that PuertoRicans have made-and the sacrifices which caused countless lives fought in all wars as American citizens can not be trashed away. There is no such thing as free Association and still be American citizens! If Puerto Rico becomes independent how can sustain American citizenship! Puerto Rico will loose all the benefits that it is now enjoying and things will get better. Much better than many other countries around the world! As I said it’s not perfect, but, better! The only solution is Statehood.

generoman

The newest proposal from MAP is part of the PPD campaign to confuse, delay, obfuscate, and derail any serious attempt to permanently resolve the status question.

The PPD and its mainland allies are on the defensive. They are drowning amid the status clarity produced by Congressional hearings, reports and White House task forces.

What have we learned since the 105th Congress studied, debated and deliberated the Young Bill (1997-98)?

The only two status options that PERMANENTLY resolve the status quagmire are: statehood or independence.

PPD proposals to enhance, develop or create a new commonwealth status are unconstitutional, absurd, unrealistic, unenforceable, and dishonest.

Congress and the White House have been reiterating this since those Young Bill debates of 1998.

The PPD is NOT interested in permanently resolving the status question. There would be no need for the PPD as a political party if that happened.

The PPD wants to run out the clock on any serious congressional proposal that RESOLVES the status question.

They want to live on to fight another day. They have lost a lot of battles over the past 20 years, but as a political party they are alive (barely). That means they will be able to continue their disinformation campaign in the future.

generoman

Just discovered this gem thanks to Frank Bruni’s October 14, 2021 column in the NY Times: “Where Biden is Most Vulnerable.” Bruni references Ryan Cooper’s description of Senator Kyrsten Sinema (D-AZ) in The Week. Cooper writes: “This is political centrism as a vacuous nullity, a lidless reptilian eye ever gazing into a lightless political tomb where no truth is spoken and nothing ever happens.”

An apt description of the Popular Democratic Party of Puerto Rico, MAP and their mainland allies?

Source: The sucking political void of Democratic centrists by Ryan Cooper, The Week, September 30, 2021.
https://theweek.com/feature/opinion/1005482/the-sucking-political-void-of-democratic-centrists

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.