In less than a week, the Supreme Court has ruled on three cases impacting Puerto Rico. The rulings are consistent: Puerto Rico may have local authority, but it lacks ultimate power over itself and it will not gain this power absent statehood or independence.
On Thursday, the Court held in Sanchez Valle that Puerto Rico could not independently prosecute individuals if they already had faced federal charges for the same crime. In a footnote, the Supreme Court clarified that Puerto Rico is not on “equal footing” with the States, and does not share in their “power, dignity and authority.”
On Monday, the Supreme Court ruled that Puerto Rico had no authority to enact a bankruptcy law to fill a void in the federal bankruptcy law. Writing for the majority, Justice Clarence Thomas rejected the dissent’s view that “the government and people of Puerto Rico should not have to wait for possible congressional action to avert the consequences” and held instead that “our constitutional structure does not permit this Court to ‘rewrite the statute that Congress has enacted.'”
Reinforcing its position that a United States territory is dependent on Congress, the Court on Monday also rejected in Tuaua v. United States an effort by individuals born in the territory of American Samoa to gain the right to U.S. citizenship from birth under the Fourteenth Amendment. Samoans have been designated by Congress as U.S. nationals, but they are not U.S. citizens.
Writing for Scotusblog, constitutional expert Lyle Denniston concluded: “Although the Court’s two decisions on Puerto Rico and its order not to consider citizenship for Samoans were legally independent of each other, the three cases had been part of a rising campaign for self-determination in U.S. territories and, in particular, to persuade the Court to reconsider a series of early twentieth-century decisions (the so-called Insular Cases) that modern critics complain were based on outmoded notions of racial supremacy and colonial dominance. The Insular Cases precedents have been used to maintain territories’ dependence on Congress.”
Denniston, who has covered the Supreme Court for fifty-eight years, summed up the current legal predicament for Puerto Rico, writing that “it is now clear, in the wake of the Court’s actions in these cases, that the only way for Puerto Rico to gain equal stature within the U.S. governmental structure is to seek statehood — a highly controversial issue among Puerto Ricans.”
I am so happy to know that this issued has been clarified, something statehooders and independentistas has known for years. This ELA must come to an end.
I heard that the first one who migrated to the states were the so call independentista, haha
They did. Wealthy independentistas migrated first, got teaching & social jobs (remember, Puerto Rico schools were in english until 1952 or about, when Vilaronga banished it.)So these people were bilingual!
As soon as second generation “Nuyoricans” went to school,”ESL” placed them in spanish language classrooms where they were exposed to their separatist victimology.
They are in charge of the NYC “National PR Day Parade”,which every year dedicates the parade to a leftist independence “fighter or “political prisoner” especially Oscar Lopez.
[…] Almost twenty years later, Puerto Rico’s status is still unresolved and Congress is still the only entity that can change that. As an unincorporated territory, Puerto Rico is in a position of powerlessness, a fact that has been reinforced repeatedly this year by the Supreme Court. […]
[…] Supreme Court was clear about Congressional authority over Puerto Rico in Puerto Rico v. Sanchez Valle, a decision the Court issued as the House of Representatives debated PROMESA. In Sanchez […]
[…] Rico, as a territory of the United States, has no sovereignty as a political entity. The Supreme Court confirmed this in 2016, ruling in several cases that Puerto Rico continues to be under the rule of the […]
[…] amendment, according to CRS, therefore doesn’t apply to people born in Puerto Rico. (In 2016, the Supreme Court confirmed in Tuaua v. U.S. that the Constitution’s 14th amendment does not apply to people born in a […]
[…] 2016, the U.S. Supreme Court made it clear that Puerto Rico has no sovereignty under its current territorial status. Prior to […]
[…] to achieve as a U.S. territory – a question that got answered for many when the Supreme Court ruled in 2016 that Puerto Rico has no independent sovereignty. On June 11, 2017, just 1.3% of voters […]
[…] “The people of Puerto Rico, in the exercise of their sovereignty…” However, the Supreme Court has specifically stated that Puerto Rico has no sovereignty. Unsurprisingly, members of the federal […]
[…] Supreme Court decided in 2016 that Puerto Rico as a territory does not have the “power, dignity and authority” of a […]
[…] held on the island. Meanwhile the popularity of “commonwealth” has waned as Supreme Court cases and the PROMESA board have exposed Puerto Rico as a U.S. territory with no inherent […]
[…] would bring. There are 50 real world examples of U.S. statehood, and, as the Supreme Court has made clear, all 50 are on “equal footing” with each […]